|
|
| |
Resources
|
| |
Chemicals in Sunscreens
|
Absorbing
Titanium from Sunscreens
Skin & Allergy News (February 1997, p. 15)
Titanium dioxide, a compound whose toxicity remains
unclear, is an ingredient found in many sunscreens.
Researchers now say the chemical can be absorbed by
human skin. Titanium dioxide is a fine, white powder,
used in sunscreens because of its ability to reflect and
scatter ultraviolet light. The compound's full effects
on human health are still under investigation. The U.S.
government's National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) labels the chemical "a potential
occupational carcinogen." |
| |
Sun-Care
Chemical Proves Toxic in Lab Tests
Mark Henderson, Science Correspondent
The Sunday Times (London)The main chemical used
in sun lotions to filter out ultraviolet light may be
TOXIC, particularly when exposed to sunshine.
Octyl methoxycinnamate (OMC), which is present in 90
per cent of sunscreen brands, was found to kill mouse
cells even at low doses in a study by Norwegian
scientists.
It is not certain that the effects on mice are
repeated in human beings, although the findings reported
in New Scientist magazine suggest that human cells could
be damaged if a sunscreen containing OMC penetrates the
outer layer of dead skin and comes into contact with
living tissue.
Terje Christensen, a biophysicist from the Norwegian
Radiation Protection Authority, near Oslo, said her
research showed that sunscreens should be treated with
caution, and used only when it was impractical to stay
indoors or to shield the skin from the sun with clothes.
The chemical is used as a filter for the more harmful
UVB light. In Dr Christensen's study, mouse tissue grown
in culture was treated with a solution of OMC at five
parts per million - a much lower concentration than in
sunscreens. Half the cells treated with OMC died,
compared with fewer than 10 per cent in a control
experiment.
When researchers shone a lamp for two hours to
simulate midday sunshine, more cells died. Dr
Christensen suggested that the reaction between OMC and
sunlight created an effect that was twice as toxic as
the chemical alone.
The Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association,
which represents sunscreen manufacturers in Britain,
said that OMC "has been thoroughly tested for safety"
and was approved by regulatory authorities in Europe and
the US.
|
Health
concerns Place Sunscreen Ingredients Under Scrutiny
Chemical Week, October 18, 2000 p24
By Jessica BrownOctyl Methoxycinnamate (OMC),
used as a UVB filter in 90% of sun lotions, may harm
human skin cells, say researchers at the Norwegian
Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA; Osteras). BASF’s
new 4,500-m.t./year OMC plant at Ludwigshaven, Germany
is due onstream early in 2001. “OMC has been thoroughly
tested, but company toxicology experts are evaluating
the Norwegian study,” says BASF.
The concern over OMC follows publication of a study
last year which found that
2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid (PBSA), a UV
filter used in about 25% of sun lotions, may also damage
human skin cells (Chemical Week, Jan 13, 1999, p.15). No
studies show the effects from combining the two
chemicals. BASF also manufactures PBSA.“
It is a theoretical possibility that human cells
could be damaged by OMC,” says NRPA biophysicist Terje
Christensen. NPRA researchers found that about 50% of
cells died when exposed to a very low concentration of
OMC. The toxic effect may also be magnified by exposure
to sunlight, the researchers say. More cells died when
light was shone on the cells in the OMC solution. “The
problem is that some of the products formed when OMC is
broken down by exposure to the sun are more toxic than
the original substance,” says Christensen. OMC could
harm human cells if it penetrates the outer layer of
dead skin, he says.
Dr. Mercola's Comment:
We ALL need sunshine to stay healthy. It is one of
the essential ingredients for staying healthy. It is not
the perniciously evil item that traditional medicine
suggests that it is.
That does not mean that we should all go out and get
sunburned. That should be avoided as it is likely to
lead to an increase in skin cancer. However, prudent
exposure to the sun, integrating the listening to your
body concept, will not.
Adding sun screens is NOT a good way to limit your
sun exposure. Staying out of the sun early on in the
season and limiting your exposure until your system
adjusts by increasing melanin pigmentation in your skin
is.
Additionally, consuming many whole vegetables will
increase antioxidant levels in the body which will also
provide protection against any sun induced radiation
damage.
So the bottom line is to avoid the sun screens. They
are not necessary and will actually increase your risk
of disease. |
| |
Studies of
Sunscreen Ingredients, 1998- Jane Sheppard-Publisher of
Healthy Child
Regarding the explosion of the sun and excess radiation,
yesterday my daughter got a sunburn after I applied her
normal amount of sunscreen that usually protects her.
And it was foggy here most of the day. I wondered if
there was excess radiation by the sun.
I'm continuing to look for information on sunscreen
ingredients. If anyone has more information, please
e-mail me. I'm writing an article on this for the next
issue of Healthy Child. The following are some of the
studies I found:
Lancet 1997 Sep 20;350(9081):863-4
Systemic absorption of sunscreen after topical
application.
Hayden CG, Roberts MS, Benson HA
Some excerpts from this study:
"It is often assumed that little or none of a topically
applied substance is absorbed into the systemic
circulation. We show that substantial amounts of an
applied sunscreen, oxybenzone, are absorbed and
subsequently excreted in human urine. Oxybenzone has low
acute
toxicity in animal studies yet little is know about its
chronic toxicity and disposition after topical
application in people.
Oxybenzone is a benzophenone derivative commonly used
throughout the world to make sun-products with
especially high sun protection factors (SPF)."
"Our results suggest that sunscreens should not be the
sole method of sun protection. It would be prudent not
to apply oxybenzone to large surface areas of skin for
extended and repeated periods of time, unless no
alternative protection is available. There may be an
additional concern for young children who have less
well-developed processes of elimination, and have a
larger surface area per body weight than adults, with
respect to systemic availability of a topically applied
dose."
Other studies of interest:
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 48 (4), 635-637
© Blackwell Science Ltd
2. Absorption of sunscreens across human skin: an
evaluation of commercial products for children and
adults
R. Jiang2, M. S. Roberts3, D. M. Collins2 and H. A. E.
Benson1
Aims Topical sunscreens are routinely applied to the
skin by a large percentage of the population. This study
assessed the extent of absorption of a number of common
chemical sunscreen agents into and through human skin
following application of commercially available
products.
Methods Sunscreen products were applied to excised human
epidermis in Franz diffusion cells with the amount
penetrating into and across the epidermis assessed by
h.p.l.c. for 8 h following application.
Results All sunscreen agents investigated penetrated
into the skin (0.25 g m-2 or 14% of applied dose), but
only benzophenone-3 passed through the skin in
significant amounts (0.08 g m-2 or 10% of the applied
dose). With one exception, sunscreen agents in
corresponding products marketed for adults and children
had similar skin penetration profiles.
Conclusions Whilst limited absorption across the skin
was observed for the majority of the sunscreens tested,
benzophenone-3 demonstrated sufficiently high
penetration to warrant further investigation of its
continued application.
3. Australas J Dermatol 1999 Feb;40(1):51-3
Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
4. The PABA story.
Mackie BS, Mackie LE Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney,
Australia.
The qualities of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) are
discussed and an account is given of how it came to be
the favorite sunscreen of the post World War II era.
Slowly, however, dermatologists became aware that it was
a fairly common sensitizer and that it tended to
cross-sensitize with compounds of similar chemical
structure both in contact with the skin and given as
systemic drugs. Furthermore, continued exposure to
chemicals of this type could lead to autoimmune
responses especially systemic lupus erythematosus and
dermatomyositis. Discussion of these complications from
the use of PABA took place at two meetings of the
Dermatological Association of Australia in 1964 and
1965, and played a part in the slow withdrawal of PABA
from sunscreens.
Publication Types: Historical article
PMID: 10098293, UI: 99198366 29: FEBS Lett 1997 Nov
24;418(1-2):87-90
Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
5. Chemical oxidation and DNA damage catalyzed by
inorganic sunscreen ingredients.
Dunford R, Salinaro A, Cai L, Serpone N, Horikoshi S,
Hidaka H, Knowland J
University of Oxford, Department of Biochemistry, UK.
This is now a known carcinogen Titanium dioxide (TiO2)
has been noted (US Federal Register, 43FR38206, 25
August 1978) to be an unsafe physical sunscreen because
it reflects and scatters UVB and UVA in sunlight.
However, TiO2 absorbs about 70% of incident UV, and in
aqueous environments this leads to the generation of
hydroxyl radicals which can initiate oxidations. Using
chemical methods, we show that all sunscreen TiO2
samples tested catalyze the photo-oxidation of a
representative organic substrate (phenol). We also show
that sunlight-illuminated TiO2 catalyses DNA damage both
in vitro and in human cells. These results may be
relevant to the overall effects of sunscreens.
PMID: 9414101, UI: 98074912
45: Toxicol Lett 1995 Oct;80(1-3):61-7
Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
6. Safety evaluation of benzophenone-3 after dermal
administration in rats.
Okereke CS, Barat SA, Abdel-Rahman MS
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of
Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical
School, Newark 07103-2714, USA.
Benzophenone-3 (BZ-3) is a category 1 (over-the-counter)
product approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) for use as a sunscreen agent in medicine,
cosmetics, industry, and agriculture. This is due to its
ability to absorb and dissipate ultraviolet light in a
harmless manner, thus protecting human skin and products
from UV irradiation. This study investigated the safety
of BZ-3 after repeated administration. BZ-3 in ointment
base was applied at a dose of 100 mg/kg body wt. twice
daily, for 4 weeks to the skin of male Sprague-Dawley
rats. Body weight, organ to body weight ratios,
hematological, and clinical chemistry parameters were
not effected. Pathological examination revealed no
significant changes between control and treated animals.
No gross external abnormalities were observed. Both in
vivo and in vitro blood glutathione
(GSH) levels were effected by BZ-3 treatment. However,
after 60 min of incubation, a reversal of this effect
was observed in the treatment group as blood GSH levels
approached normal levels. Furthermore, investigation of
GSH-reductase and peroxidase with time indicated an
increase in GSH-reductase activity at 60 and 90 min with
no effect on GSH-peroxidase. Pre-treatment with
phenobarbital modulated the metabolic disposition of
BZ-3. There was an increase in the formation of the
hydroxyl metabolites but not the O-dealkylated form.
This study suggests that BZ-3 is not toxic to rats when
applied dermally at a dose of 100 mg/kg body wt. for 4
weeks.
PMID: 7482593, UI: 96062138 65: FEBS Lett 1993 Jun
21;324(3):309-13
Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
7. Sunlight-induced mutagenicity of a common
sunscreen ingredient.
Knowland J, McKenzie EA, McHugh PJ, Cridland NA
Department of Biochemistry, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1
3QU, UK.
We have tested the mutagenicity of a UV-B sunscreen
ingredient called Padimate-O or octyl dimethyl PABA,
which, chemically speaking, is identical to an
industrial chemical that generates free radicals when
illuminated. It is harmless in the dark but mutagenic in
sunlight, attacking DNA directly. A commercial sunscreen
containing Padimate-O behaves in the same way. UV-A in
sunlight also excites Padimate-O, although less than
UV-B. Some related compounds, including a known
carcinogen, behave similarly. As mutagens may be
carcinogenic, our results suggest that some sunscreens
could, while preventing sunburn, contribute to
sunlight-related cancers.
Comments:
Comment in: FEBS Lett 1993 Dec 20;336(1):184-5;
discussion 186
PMID: 8405372, UI: 94009604 64: J Toxicol Environ Health
1997 Aug 8;51(5):447-62
8. Effect of environmental conditions on the
penetration of benzene through human skin.
Nakai JS, Chu I, Li-Muller A, Aucoin R
Health Canada, Bureau of Chemical Hazards, Environmental
Health Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
The in vitro penetration of [14C]benzene through freshly
prepared human skin was examined under a variety of skin
conditions associated with swimming and bathing. The
experimental system utilized a recirculating donor
solution and a flow-through receiver solution, and was
modified to accommodate the analysis of volatiles. The
permeability coefficient of 0.14 cm/h under standard
conditions at 26 degrees C was found to increase to 0.26
cm/h at 50 degrees C and decrease to 0.10 cm/h at 15
degrees C. Storage of the skin at- 20 degrees C did not
affect the penetration of benzene. Application of baby
oil, moisturizer, or insect repellant to the skin before
exposure under standard conditions did not affect the
flux of benzene, but a significant increase was observed
when the skin was pretreated with sunscreen
(permeability coefficient 0.24 cm/h). These results
suggest that risk assessment or exposure modeling for
benzene and other environmental contaminants should
account for appropriate changes in the environmental
conditions when considering the dermal route of
exposure.
PMID: 9233379, UI: 97377744
24: Mutat Res 1998 May 11;414(1-3):15-20
Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
9. Induction of sister chromatid exchanges and
micronuclei by titanium dioxide in Chinese hamster
ovary-K1 cells.
Lu PJ, Ho IC, Lee TC
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica,
Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has color properties of extreme
whiteness and brightness, is relatively inexpensive, and
is extensively used as a white pigment in a variety of
materials. TiO2, an effective blocker of ultraviolet
light, is frequently added to sunscreens and cosmetic
creams. However, the genotoxicity of TiO2 remains to be
controversial. In this report, we have demonstrated that
TiO2 can be transported into Chinese hamster ovary-K1
(CHO-K1) cells. The effects of TiO2 on induction of
sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) and micronuclei (MN)
were then studied in these cells. The SCE frequency in
CHO-K1 cells treated with TiO2 at a nonlethal dose range
(0 to 5 microM) for 24 h was significantly and
dose-dependently increased. By the conventional MN
assay, TiO2 at the dose ranged from 0 to 20 microM
slightly increased the MN frequency in CHO-K1 cells.
However, in the cytokinesis-block MN assay, the number
of MN per 1000 binucleated cells was significantly and
dose-dependently enhanced in CHO-K1 cells treated TiO2
at the same dose range for 24 h. These results suggest
that TiO2 is a potential genotoxic agent. Copyright 1998
Elsevier Science B.V.
PMID: 9630482, UI: 98296327
9. Sunscreen Use Not Tied to Malignant Melanoma
Some of these articles were put together by
Jane Sheppard
Future Generations
Publisher of Healthy Child Newsletter
http://www.healthychild.com
Vital, In-depth Information on Children's Health Issues
and others put together by Shelley Kramer Email for more
answers to questions: Shelley Kramer -
shelley@healthy-communications.com
|
Skin Biology
Aging Reversal SciencesTM
Chapter 9.2 The Chemical Sunscreen Health
Disaster
Questions about our products or need advice about
what is best for you? Call Toll-Free 800-405-1912- Talk
to Real People - No Phone Menus! Weekdays - Best Time -
10 am to 4 pm, Pacific Time or please send an email to
Contact Skin Biology
Free Radical Generators and Gender-Bending Estrogenic
Chemicals
Sunscreen chemicals may generate free radicals within
your body
Do chemical sunscreens increase cancer?
Psoriasis Treatment Increases Skin Cancer 83-fold
Toxic Estrogenic Chemical Sunscreens
Orcas of Pacific Northwest Dying from Estrogenic Toxins
The Failure of Academic Dermatologists to Protect the
Public
Free Radical Generators and Gender-Bending Estrogenic
Chemicals
For decades, irresponsible cosmetic companies and a
small group of very vocal, publicity-seeking
dermatologists have strongly advocated that chemical
sunscreens should be heavily applied before any exposure
to sunlight, even on young children. They insisted that
such sunscreen use would prevent skin cancer and protect
your health. This was despite of a lack of any adequate
safety testing of these chemicals. (It should be
emphasized that most dermatologists are much more
cautious and careful.)
On the other hand, over the past decade, many scientists
studying cancer have come to virtually the opposite
conclusion; that is, the use of sunscreen chemicals may
be increasing the incidence of cancer and that sunlight
exposure may actually decrease human cancer rates and
improve your health.
It now appears that many heavily-used chemical
sunscreens may actually increase cancers by virtue of
their free radical generating properties. And more
insidiously, many commonly used sunscreen chemicals have
strong estrogenic actions that may cause serious
problems in sexual development and adult sexual
function, and may further increase cancer risks.
It is not that these compounds were ever viewed as
benign substances. Organic chemists have been long aware
of the dangers of compounds in chemical sunscreens. Such
chemicals are widely used to start free radical
reactions during chemical synthesis. These chemicals are
the dangerous types that one carefully keeps away from
your skin while working in a laboratory. To use them,
you mix them into a combination of other chemicals, then
flash the mixture with an ultraviolet light. The
ultraviolet absorbing chemicals then generate copious
amounts of free radicals that initiated the desired
chemical reactions.
Despite the medical establishment's near unanimity on
the issue of sunlight exposure, on other health issues
in the past, serious errors been promoted to the public.
1. In 1927, 12,745 physicians endorsed smoking Lucky
Strike cigarettes as a healthful activity. In the 1940s
and 1950s, thousands of prominent surgeons were used in
national cigarette advertisements to reassure the public
about the safety of cigarette smoking.
2. In the 1950's, lobotomies were promoted for mental
disorders and produced near-totally dysfunctional
people.
3. In the 1960's and 1970's, diets high in omega-6
polyunsaturated fats and partially hydrogenated fatty
acids such as safflower oil and margarine were
recommended to reduce heart disease. However, long term
studies found that, while such diets decreased heart
disease, they increased the total death rate and the
cancer rate and produced accelerated aging.
Chemical sunscreens have three primary defects:
1. They are powerful free radical generators.
Their free radical generation increases cellular damage
and changes that lead to cancer. Psoralen - such a
compound that is used to treat psoriasis increases skin
cancer rates 83-fold.
2. They often have strong estrogenic activity.
Estrogenic - "Gender Bending" - chemicals interfere with
normal sexual development - Engendering a host of
secondary medical problems - see more below.
3. They are synthetic chemicals that are alien to the
human body and accumulate in body fat stores. The human
body is well adapted to de-toxify biologicals that it
has been exposed to over tens of millions of years. But
it has often has difficulty removing new and
non-biological compounds such DDT, Dioxin, PCBs, and
chemical sunscreens.
Chemical sunscreens include:
Benzophenones (dixoybenzone, oxybenzone)
PABA and PABA esters (ethyl dihydroxy propyl PAB,
glyceryl PABA, p-aminobenzoic acid, padimate-O or octyl
dimethyl PABA)
Cinnamates (cinoxate, ethylhexyl p-methoxycinnamate,
octocrylene, octyl methoxycinnamate)
Salicylates (ethylhexyl salicylate, homosalate, octyl
salicylate)
Digalloyl trioleate
Menthyl anthranilate
Avobenzone [butyl-methyoxydibenzoylmethane; Parsol 1789]
- This is the only chemical sunscreen currently allowed
by the European Community. However, its safety is still
questionable since it easily penetrates the skin and is
a strong free radical generator.
|
Sunscreen
chemicals may generate free radicals within your body
Most chemical sunscreens contain, as UVA and
UVB blockers, from 2 to 5% of compounds such avobenzone,
benzophenone, ethylhexyl p-methoxycinnimate,
2-ethylhexyl salicylate, homosalate, octyl
methoxycinnamate, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3) as the
active ingredients.Benzophenone (and similar compounds)
is one of the most powerful free radical generators
known. It is used in industrial processes as a free
radical generator to initiate chemical reactions.
Benzophenone is activated by ultraviolet light energy
that breaks benzophenone's double bond to produce two
free radical sites. The free radicals then react with
other molecules and produce damage to the fats,
proteins, and DNA of the cells - the types of damage
that produce skin aging and the development of cancer.
Adding to the problem is that large amounts of applied
sunscreens can enter the bloodstream though your skin.
In the 1970s, Prof. Howard Maibach warned that up to 35
percent of sunscreen applied to the skin can pass
through the skin and enter the bloodstream but this had
little effect on sunscreen promotion or safety testing.
(Maibach, H. "NDELA-Percutaneous Penetration." FDA
Contract 223-75-2340, May 19, 1978) The longer sunscreen
chemicals are left on the skin, the greater the
absorption into the body. (Bronaugh, R.L., et al. "The
effect of cosmetic vehicles on the penetration of N-nitrosodiethanolamine
through excised human skin, J Invest Dermatol; 1981;
76(2): 94-96.) This may be a factor in the large
increases in cancer (breast, uterine, colon, prostate)
observed in regions, such as Northern Australia, where
the use of sunscreen chemicals has been heavily promoted
by medical groups and the local governments.
Many sunscreens also contain triethanolamine, a compound
that can cause the formation of cancer causing
nitrosamines in products by combining with nitrite used
as preservative and often not disclosed on sunscreen
labels.
In March 1998, Dr. John Knowland of the University of
Oxford reported studies showing that certain sunscreens
containing PABA and its derivatives can damage DNA, at
least in the test tube experiments. When a chemical
sunscreen, Padimate-O, was added to DNA and the mixture
exposed to the ultraviolet rays of sunlight, it was
found that the sunscreen broke down in sunlight,
releasing highly active agents that could damage DNA. It
did not block out the UV, but instead absorbed energy.
“It became excited and set off a chemical reaction that
resulted in the generation of the dangerous free
radicals and broken DNA strands that can lead to
cancer,” he said and further commented that while it's
too early to make blanket recommendations, “I would not
use a product containing PABA, Padimate-O or other PABA
derivatives.” Dr. Martin Rieger reported that PABA may
play a role in DNA-dimer formation, a type of DNA damage
that can induce carcinogenic changes.
Avobenzone (Parsol 1789) May Not Be Safe Either
In 1997, Europe, Canada, and Australia changed
sunscreens to use three specific active sunscreen
ingredients - avobenzone (also known as Parsol 1789),
titanium dioxide, and zinc oxide - as the basis of
sunscreens. In the USA, the cosmetic companies have held
off this policy as they try to sell off their stockpiles
of cosmetics containing toxic sunscreens banned in other
countries.
However, avobenzone is a powerful free radical generator
and also should have been banned. Avobenzone is easily
absorbed through the epidermis and is still a chemical
that absorbs ultraviolet radiation energy. Since it
cannot destroy this energy, it has to convert the light
energy into chemical energy, which is normally released
as free radicals. While it blocks long-wave UVA, it does
not effectively UVB or short-wave UVA radiation, and is
usually combined with other sunscreen chemicals to
produce a "broad-spectrum" product. In sunlight,
avobenzone degrades and becomes ineffective within about
1 hour.
Do chemical sunscreens increase cancer?
Worldwide, the greatest rise in melanoma has been
experienced in countries where chemical sunscreens have
been heavily promoted The rise in melanoma has been
exceptionally high in Queensland, Australia where the
medical establishment has vigorously promoted the use of
sunscreens. Queensland now has more incidences of
melanoma per capita than any other place on Earth.
(Garland, Cedric F., et al. Could sunscreens increase
melanoma risk? American Journal of Public Health, Vol.
82, No. 4, April 1992, pp. 614-15).
Dr. Gordon Ainsleigh in California believes that the use
of sunscreens causes more cancer deaths than it
prevents. He estimates that the 17% increase in breast
cancer observed between 1981 and 1992 may be the result
of the pervasive use of sunscreens over the past decade
(Ainsleigh, H. Gordon. Beneficial effects of sun
exposure on cancer mortality. Preventive Medicine, Vol.
22, February 1993, pp. 132-40). Recent studies have also
shown a higher rate of melanoma among men who regularly
use sunscreens and a higher rate of basal cell carcinoma
among women using sunscreens (Garland, Cedric F. et al.
Effect of sunscreens on UV radiation-induced enhancement
of melanoma growth in mice. Journal of the National
Cancer Institute, Vol. 86, No. 10, May 18, 1994, pp.
798-801 :Larsen, H.R. "Sunscreens: do they cause skin
cancer." International Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine, 1994; 12(12): 17-19; Farmer K.C.
& Naylor, M.F. "Sun exposure, sunscreens, and skin
cancer prevention: a year-round concern." Ann
Pharmacother, 1996; 30(6):662-73)
Drs. Cedric and Frank Garland of the University of
California have pointed out that while sunscreens do
protect against sunburn, there is no scientific proof
that they protect against melanoma or basal cell
carcinoma in humans (Garland, C.F., et al. "Could
sunscreens increase melanoma risk?" American Journal of
Public Health, 1992; 82(4): 614-615.) The Garlands
believe that the increased use of chemical sunscreens is
the primary cause of the skin cancer epidemic. There is,
however, some evidence that regular use of sunscreens
helps prevent the formation of actinic keratoses, the
precursors of squamous cell carcinoma (Dover, Jeffrey S.
& Arndt, Kenneth A. Dermatology. Journal of the American
Medical Association, Vol. 271, No. 21, June 1, 1994, pp.
1662-63).
In February 1998, epidemiologist Marianne Berwick of
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York
presented a careful analysis of data on sunscreen use
and skin cancer at the annual meeting of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science. Sunscreens
may not protect against skin cancer, including melanoma,
she concluded. "We don't really know whether sunscreens
prevent skin cancer," said Berwick. She looked first at
four studies of squamous cell cancer, a cancer that
appears on the head, neck, and arms but is usually not
lethal. Two of the studies concluded that sunscreen
protected against a skin condition thought to precede
squamous cell cancer while two other studies reported
that sunscreen did not shield people from this type of
skin cancer. She then analyzed two studies of basal cell
carcinoma, another nonlethal skin cancer that is the
most common form of skin cancer and appears most
frequently on the head, neck, and arms. Those two
studies found that people who used sunscreen were more
likely to develop basal cell cancer than people who did
not. She then analyzed 10 studies of melanoma, the skin
cancer is the most deadly. Melanoma often starts in or
near moles on the skin. In five of the melanoma studies,
people who used sunscreen were more likely than nonusers
to develop melanoma. In three of the studies, there was
no association between sunscreen use and melanoma. In
the final two studies, people who used sunscreen seemed
to be protected. (Source: Science News, Vol. 153, No.
23, June 6, 1998, p. 360).
"After examining the available epidemiological data and
conducting our own large case-control population-based
study, we have found no relationship between sunscreen
use at any age and the development of melanoma skin
cancer," said Dr. Berwick. Although sunscreens do
prevent sunburn, Dr. Berwick concluded that sunburn
itself is not the direct cause of cancer. Dr. Berwick
objected to the universal blanket advice about using
sunscreens during all time spent outdoors.
Dr. Berwick previously conducted a 1996 study that found
no link between sunscreen use at any age and the
development of melanoma. The same study also found no
relationship between a history of sunburn and the
development of melanoma. Berwick continued saying that
the relationship between sunscreen use and the
development of skin cancer is complicated by evidence
that people who are sensitive to the sun engage in fewer
activities in the bright sun and wear sunscreen when
they do. But if these people develop melanoma, it may be
because they are genetically susceptible and likely to
develop skin cancer regardless of the amount of sunlight
exposure or protection from sunscreen.
"Based on the evidence, we conclude that sunburn itself
probably does not cause melanoma, but that it is an
important sign of excessive sun exposure particularly
among those who are genetically susceptible because of
their skin-type," said Dr. Berwick. The melanoma risk
for people with numerous moles was six times higher than
that of someone with only a few moles. Persons most at
risk for melanoma are those with red or blond hair and
lighter colored eyes. Such light-skinned people have
almost six times more melanoma than persons with darker
skin. "The evidence indicates that chronic sun exposure
may be protective for the development of melanoma
because the skin has adapted to the sun, having become
thicker as it has tanned. On the other hand,
intermittent sun exposure appears to increase risk,
making it much less protective," added Dr. Berwick.
"People need to focus on their individual risk
characteristics, such as their pigmentary phenotype,
their family history, and the type and number of moles
they have. I recommend that people avoid the sun when
they are clearly at high risk and that they should enjoy
a reasonable amount of outdoor activities with less
anxiety when they are clearly at reduced risk," advised
Dr. Berwick.
After Dr. Berwick's presentation of this data, the
American Academy of Dermatology (ADA) issued a press
release attacking her work. The then president of the
ADA insulted her as a "number crunching scientist". But
then, all scientists spend a lot of time crunching
numbers.
Studies have found that the incidence of skin cancers
has increased even as sunscreens have become popular
among fair-skinned people. The establishment answer to
this increase in the cancer rate is that wearing
sunscreen makes people stay in the sun too long. A study
by Drs. Mike Brown (Kate Law of the Cancer Research
Campaign) Philippe Autier (European Institute of
Oncology in Milan) reported that children using
sunscreen returned from holiday with more skin moles - a
possible sign of increased cancer risk. Some say that
people who wore higher factor sunscreens tend to stay
out in sunlight much longer, because they fell
protected. However, others have pointed out that if
sunscreen chemicals were protective, the factors of
longer sun exposure would be somewhat countered by the
sunscreen's supposed protective actions.
|
Skin cancer
increase not due to ozone depletion
But what about ozone depletion and skin
cancer? Could this be the cause of the increased skin
cancer rates? Professor Johan Moan of the Norwegian
Cancer Institute found that the yearly incidence of
melanoma in Norway had increased by 350% for men and by
440% for women during the period 1957 to 1984. He also
determined that there had been no change in the ozone
layer over this period of time. He concludes his report
in the British Journal of Cancer by stating "Ozone
depletion is not the cause of the increase in skin
cancers" (Moan, J. & Dahlback, A. The relationship
between skin cancers, solar radiation and ozone
depletion. British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 65, No. 6,
June 1992, pp. 916-21).
|
Psoriasis
Treatment Increases Skin Cancer 83-fold
Researchers at the Harvard Medical School discovered
that psoralen, another ultraviolet light-activated, free
radical generator that is chemically similar to
sunscreens, is an extremely efficient carcinogen. They
found that the rate of squamous cell carcinoma among
patients with psoriasis, who had been repeatedly treated
with UVA light after a topical application of psoralen,
was 83 times higher than among the general population
(Stern, Robert S. and Laid, Nan. The carcinogenic risk
of treatments for severe psoriasis. Cancer, Vol. 73, No.
11, June 1, 1994, pp. 2759-64).
|
"Estrogenic sunscreen chemicals might explain
most of the social changes in California over
the past 30 years."
A California customer
Toxic Estrogenic Chemical Sunscreens
Even worse for your health is the fact that
many common free radical generating sunscreen chemicals
also have estrogen like-effects. Such effects can
increase cancers, cause birth defects in children, lower
sperm counts and penis size in men, plus a plethora of
other medical problems. These effects are similar to
many banned chemicals such as DDT, Dioxin, PCBs.
Estrogenic chemicals can mimic hormonal (or real)
estrogen, the key female sex hormone. When the body's
hormone receptors recognize the estrogenic chemical as
estrogen, the result is feminization of the tissue.
Some of these effects may be more subtle than physical
abnormalities and may manifest themselves as behavioral
changes (Fox et al. 1978), such as aberrant behavior of
birds during nesting, which can have significant effects
on their nesting success.
Government regulations require that new chemicals pass
screening tests to determine that they do not cause
cancer. But no rules yet require similar testing of
chemicals for effects on reproductive hormones.
Common Estrogenic Toxins
DDT (Dichloro, diphenyl, trichloroethane)
Insecticide, especially for mosquitoes
Dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and similar
chemicals)
Chemical by-product during manufacturing of insecticides
and plastics
PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls)
Insulating oil for electrical transformers
2,4-D
Broadleaf weed killer
Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
A potent synthetic estrogen
Chemical Sunscreens
Blocking ultraviolet rays on human skin
Expected Effects of Estrogenic Chemicals in Humans
In Women:
Endometriosis
Migrane
Severe PMS
Erratic Periods
Increased Breast and Uterine Cancer
Fibrocystic breast disease
Uterine cysts
In Men:
Lowered Sperm Counts
Sexual Indentity Confusion - Feminization
Breast Enlargement
Smaller then normal penis size
More testicular cancer
Undescended testicles
Block or reduce fetal imprinting of male behavior
pattern in brain
Discovery of Gender-Bending Estrogenic Chemicals in
the Environment
In the 1950s, the effect of estrogenic toxins such
as DDT was linked to eggshell thinning in many bird
species. Chemicals with estrogen-like actions can also
cause severe developmental problems such as turning fish
into hermaphrodites. Over the past 50 years, studies on
estrogenic toxins have greatly expanded our knowledge of
these effect - some of which is detailed below.
Many hormone affecting chemicals remain in widespread
use. 2,4-D, and similar products, are largest-selling
broadleaf herbicides in North America and some 60
million pounds of such chemicals are applied annually in
the USA alone. Three widely used pesticides are
estrogenic: dieldrin, toxaphene, and endosulfan. While
dieldrin and toxaphene have been banned, endosulfan
remains the USA's most heavily used pesticide.
Not all environmental gender-benders are estrogenic.
Benomyl, a fungicide used on crops such as rice,
tomatoes, apples, and grapes, has toxic actions on the
testes where it causes the premature release of cells
that would have become sperm.
Also, the greatest increases in human cancers over the
last 30 years have been those of the breast, ovaries,
testes, and prostate, all tissues that are sensitive to
sex hormones.
Many Common Sunscreen Chemicals are Strong
Estrogens
Margaret Schlumpf and her colleagues (Institute of
Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich,
Switzerland) have found that many widely-used sunscreen
chemicals mimic the effects of estrogen and trigger
developmental abnormalities in rats. (Schlumpf ,
Margaret; Beata Cotton, Marianne Conscience, Vreni
Haller, Beate Steinmann, Walter Lichtensteiger. In vitro
and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens. Environmental
Health Perspectives Vol. 109 (March 2001) pp 239-244)
Her group tested six common chemicals that are used in
sunscreens, lipsticks and facial cosmetics. Five of the
six tested chemicals (benzophenone-3, homosalate,
4-methyl-benzylidene camphor (4-MBC),
octyl-methoxycinnamate and octyl-dimethyl-PABA) behaved
like strong estrogen in lab tests and caused cancer
cells to grow more rapidly.
Uterine growth and endometriosis
One very common sunscreen chemical, 4-MBC, was mixed
with olive oil and applied to rat skin. This caused a
doubling of the rate of uterine growth well before
puberty. "That was scary, because we used concentrations
that are in the range allowed in sunscreens," said
Schlumpf. Three of the six caused developmental
abnormalities in animals. The major cause of sterility
in women in the USA is endometriosis, a condition
afflicting 5.5% of American women. Exposure to excessive
estrogen, that may have come from such sunscreens, is
felt to be the primary cause of endometriosis.
Breast milk
Schlumpf's group also found estrogenic sunscreens in
the breast milk of mothers at levels of nanograms per
kilogram of fat. This is the about same level as other
known environmental contaminants such as PCBs. Schlumpf
commented that this exposure could be dramatically
increased in childhood by the large amount of sunscreen
used by bathers, especially children. Her group is
following the offspring of 4-MBC exposed rats to see if
they develop health problems.
Based on these results, the Swiss researchers concluded
that the impact of sunscreens containing these
"endocrine disruptors" should be investigated more
closely, in particular their penetration through human
skin.
Estrogenic Synergies May Multiply Toxic Effects
Combinations of estrogenic sunscreens and other
pollutants may act together to intensify their effects.
Researchers at Tulane University in New Orleans believe
that a mixture of estrogenic toxins -- such as
sunscreens, PCBs, DDT, etc., are more harmful if mixed
together. The Tulane researchers found one mixture of
estrogenic toxins to be 160 to 1600 times more toxic
than the individual chemicals in the mixture.
Gender-Bending Effects are Most Severe During Early
Development
Current evidence points to early development
(embryo, fetus, juvenile) as the time when children's
organs are the most sensitive to estrogen exposure and
developmental abnormalities. However, some effects may
not become apparent until later in life, when normal
sexual maturity is expected.
The basic human form is female. Early in fetal
development, the genes must signal if a fetus is to be
male. The secretion of male hormones is the signal that
activates genes that cause male development. If this
does not happen, the human has female imprinting -
regardless of whether the person's cells have male (XY)
or female genes (XX). If a mother has been exposed to a
natural estrogen or estrogenic toxin during the crucial
period when genes normally activate masculine patterns,
the seventh and 14th weeks of pregnancy, then there is
not the proper switching from female to male. If the
estrogenic toxins only appear sporadically (such as when
the mother uses an estrogenic sunscreen, the disruptions
may not trigger a complete reversal of a male's gender,
but may exert subtle physical (such a reduced penis
size) and mental changes (such as sex role confusion)
that become apparent later in life. Conversely, if a
synthetic compound blocks estrogen actions, this can
produce the sex organs of a male in a fetus that is
genetically female.
After using chemical sunscreens, a pregnant woman mother
may unwittingly pass some hormone-mimicking pollutants
to her child before birth through her placental blood
supply and via her breast milk with which she later
feeds her newborn.
Some currently used pesticides have been found to
interfere with male development, producing undescended
testes, nipples on males, hypospadias, decreased sperm
counts, and altered mating behavior. When a widely used
insecticide, methoxychlor, was fed at low doses to
pregnant mice, it caused permanent increases in prostate
weight in male offspring of females.
Endocrine disruptors can affect male/female sex ratio in
Daphnia (a water flea).
Feminized Male Alligators
Male alligators exposed to pesticides in Florida
have difficulty reproducing, partly because their
penises are not developing to normal size. Effects
attributed to estrogenic environmental toxins have
produced male American alligators with underdeveloped
sex organs and vitellogenin (an egg and yolk protein
normally found only in females) in male animals.
Also, alligator eggs exposed to DDT or another
pesticide, dicofol, hatch male alligators that grow
penises only one-third to one-half normal size, and fail
to breed.
In addition, males of of many other wildlife species in
the same areas of Florida (birds, fish, amphibians, and
mammals) are being "feminized" by exposure to low levels
of pesticides and other toxic chemicals released into
the environment.
Florida Panthers
The Florida panther, an endangered species, is
failing to reproduce itself. There are only 30 to 50
panthers remaining, and the reason for the decline has
postulated to an effect of environmental estrogens.
Between 1985 and 1990, 67 percent of male panthers were
born with one or more undescended testicles (cryptorchidism).
Some Florida panthers are sterile and many others
produce abnormal or deformed sperm.
Loss of Libido in Men
Estrogenic chemicals block testosterone actions.
This can reduce sexual arousal and sensation and
contribute the a loss of libido.
Testicular Cancer
Many industrialized countries have witnessed
recently a sharp rise in testicular cancer, according to
Dr. Skakkebaek, (Department of Growth and Reproduction
at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark). Some of the
first data reporting this increase emerged in Denmark,
which has maintained a national cancer registry since
1947.
In Denmark, the incidence of testicular cancer has more
than tripled over the past 50 years and the rate of
increase continues to grow. Similar increases have also
been reported in Scotland, the United States, and other
Scandinavian countries.
Human Sperm Counts Decline
The sperm count in men in industrialized countries
has dropped 50% during the past 50 years, and the
exposure to endocrine-disrupting compounds is the most
likely cause. Skakoebaek and his group conducted an
analysis of previously published studies on semen
quality. The international data, from studies involving
14,947 men, indicate that the average density of sperm
has fallen from 113 million per milliliter of semen in
1940 to just 66 million per ml in 1990.
Skakkebaek's group also noted that because the volume of
semen available in these men at any given time has also
dropped an average of 19 percent, the 50-year drop in
sperm count has been larger than sperm density alone
would indicate.
Undescended Testicles (cryptorchidism)
Though formed near the kidneys, both testicles should
migrate down into the scrotum by birth. Undescended
testicles usually complete their migration within a year
or two after birth, but some never do. Men with
undescended testicles are unable to make sperm.
Only a few countries maintain registries on this
condition, but Skakkebaek found that two British studies
documented a near doubling of the number of boys born
with at least one undescended testicle from about 1.6
percent in the 1950s to 2.9 percent in the late 1970s.
Other studies have reported that in England and the USA,
cryptorchidism has more than doubled in men during the
last four decades. (A. Giwercman and N.E. Skakkebaek,
"The human testis--an organ at risk?" INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY Vol. 15 (1992), pgs. 373-375:
Elisabeth Carlsen and others, "Evidence for decreasing
quality of semen during past 50 years," BRITISH MEDICAL
JOURNAL Vol. 305 (1992), pgs. 609-613)
In young boys living in an area of heavy agricultural
activity on the Spanish Mediterranean coast, there was
found an association between pesticide exposure and
undescended testicles.
Hypospadias in Men
Hypospadias are congenital abnormalities of the urinary
tract. During fetal development, the penis possesses an
open groove down its length that normally closes before
birth. Boys born with only partial closure of the groove
need surgery to correct the problem.
Birth registries in England and Wales record that
hypospadias more than doubled between 1964 and 1983.
Further studies found link between undescended testicles
at birth and testicular cancer in adulthood. Low sperm
counts or abnormal sperm also are associated with
testicular cancer.
All these changes may be the consequence of fetal
exposure. Testicular cancer, undescended testicles,
hypospadias, and poor-quality semen have been found in
the male offspring of women who, during pregnancy, were
treated with diethylstilbestrol (DES), a potent
synthetic estrogen. Research at the National Institute
of Environmental Health Sciences in Research Triangle
Park, N.C. found many environmental contaminants can
mimic the reproductive effects of estrogen and DES in
male animals.
Estrogenic PCBs and Insecticides Diminish Penis Size
in Humans and Animals
Boys in Taiwan exposed to PCBs (polychlorinated
biphenyls) while in their mothers' womb developed
smaller than normal penises as they matured.
(Marguerite Holloway, "Dioxin Indictment," SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN Vol. 270 (January 1994), pg. 25.; Gina Kolata,
"PCB Exposure Linked to Birth Defects in Taiwan," NEW
YORK TIMES August 2, 1988, pg. C3)
The boys in Taiwan are called the "yucheng" (or "oil
disease") children. A similar PCB contamination ("yusho")
occurred in Japan in 1968. When 115 yucheng children
were examined, they were found to be delayed when
compared to controls. The delayed development effects in
the children's behavior that were most noticeable were
the age when they first (1) talked with sentences, (2)
turned pages of books, (3) carried out requests of
parents, and (4) were able to hold pencils and catch
balls.
The boy's mothers had eaten PCB-contaminated rice oil in
1979. The children consumed none of the oil but they
were exposed before birth to PCBs in their mother's
blood and after birth to PCBs in their mother's milk.
The rice oil contained 100 parts per million (ppm) PCBs.
A new mother in the USA has an average of one ppm PCBs
in her breast milk.
Researchers at University of Wisconsin found low
exposures before birth to dioxin, another toxic
estrogen, feminized the behavior of male rats during
adulthood, and sharply reduced their sperm production.
The researchers concluded that the fetal male
reproductive system was more sensitive to dioxin than
any other organ-system studied." (Janet Raloff, "The
Gender Benders," SCIENCE NEWS Vol. 145 (January 8,
1994), pgs. 24-27; Perinatal dioxin feminizes male
rats," SCIENCE NEWS Vol. 141 (May 30, 1992), pg. 359; "EcoCancers,"
SCIENCE NEWS Vol. 144 (July 3, 1993), pgs. 10-13)
Santa Barbara's Lesbian Seagulls
Dr. Michael Fry at University of California, Davis,
reported that Western gulls on Santa Barbara Island are
often in recent years becoming lesbian gulls, with
female pairs building nests and trying to hatch eggs and
raise offspring. Fry attributes this as partly due to
male seagulls' increasing indifference to sex.
Examinations found that the male gulls often have
feminized sex organs, attributed to the males being
"chemically castrated" by DDT and other estrogenic other
environmental pollutants.
Symptoms of excessive estrogen in women
In women, excessive estrogen and estrogen-like
chemicals produce intensified estrogen effects on the
body.
Excessive estrogen:
1. Affects your fluid balance, so that swelling due to
fluid retention may become noticeable. It can causes
elevations of blood pressure, headaches, and migraines.
2. Has a stimulating effect on breast tissue but excess
estrogen can also increase fibrocystic breast disease
and painful breast swelling.
3. Suppresses thyroid hormone production and this may
cause fatigue plus aches and pains in muscles and
joints.
4. Stimulates the appetite, makes you crave sweets,
leads to weight gain from fat as well as fluid.
5. Intensifies PMS symptoms and produce a mental feeling
of being edgy and nervous. Insomnia is also a common
side effect.
6. Increases your chances of developing emdometriosis,
breast cancer, and uterine cancer.
(An updated review of environmental estrogen and
androgen mimics and antagonists. Sonnenschein C, Soto
AM. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998 Apr;65(1-6)143-50)
The Failure of Academic Dermatologists to Protect the
Public
Why did this situation with sunscreens arise? Why
was it only research scientists who repeatedly raised
concerns about sunscreen safety? Why was the academic
dermatology community silent?
Most of the academic community has a long tradition of
informing the public about real and potential dangers to
the wider social community. When I lived in Santa
Barbara, Linus Pauling held a weekly protest in front of
the Santa Barbara Library against the testing of nuclear
weapons in the atmosphere. He continued his protests in
spite of intense pressure from the US Government and
covert campaigns of slander against him. In 1952, the
State Department refused to renew Pauling's passport.
The official reason was that his travels "would not be
in the best interest of the United States". Pauling was
unable to attend a meeting of the Royal Society in
London which was called to honor him and to discuss his
ideas about potential structures of DNA. Many felt that
he missed the chance to be the first to unravel the
structure of DNA because he wasn't able to confer with
colleagues. Although issued a short term passport in the
summer of 1952, Pauling's requests for passport renewals
were routinely denied during the next two years.
Pauling eventually won the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for
his campaign and nuclear weapons testing in the
atmosphere was terminated. But even today, in year 2002,
a study by the Center for Disease Control estimated that
the radioactive fallout from the atmospheric nuclear
weapons tests caused about 11,000 deaths from cancer in
the USA and produced a minimum of 22,000 new cancers.
Some non-governmental groups are of the opinion that the
deaths were far higher and still are responsible for
15,000 deaths yearly in the USA.
Many other academics have, in recent years, led protests
against actions and policies that were damaging to the
wider community. These include campaigns to remove
chemical toxins from foods, clothes, building materials
and the wider environment. Other concerns over global
warming, species extinction, and global poverty have
been sharply delineated by members of the academic
community.
This raises the questions as to why no member of the
academic dermatology community, over the past 30 years,
raised warnings about the dangers of chemical
sunscreens. The answer is that the cosmetic industry has
effectively silenced leading academic dermatologists by
a widespread pattern of payments in the form of
consulting fees, grants, retainers, vacation
arrangements, and so on. In essence, industry has bought
their silence on issues and products that might be
embarrassing. Most academic dermatologists focus their
attention on innocuous, safe, non-controversial topics
that will not offend their corporate sponsors. Like Dr.
Faust, they must honor their agreements with their
benefactors.
Wider Social Effects of Estrogenic Sunscreens
In countries where sunscreens have been extensively
used over the past 50 years, there have also been
profound changes in sexual attitudes and conduct. Many
scientists are of the opinion that some of these changes
have been induced by the widespread exposure to
estrogenic chemicals. These effects include sexual
confusion, unhappiness, and a difficulty in bonding with
others. This is exemplified by falling or negative birth
rates in most culturally advanced societies.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|